228AC 228RA B- DECAY 1995SO11 14NDS 201403
228AC H TYP=FUL$AUT=KHALIFEH ABUSALEEM$CIT=NDS 116, 163 (2014)$CUT=31-Dec-2012$
228AC DG CC$ FROM BrIcc v2.2b (20-Jan-2009) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
228RA P 0 0+ 5.75 Y 3 45.8 7
228RA cP QP$From 2012Wa38
228AC N 0.016 AP 1.0 1.0 1.0
228AC PN 3
228AC cN NT$From absolute ce/|b and deduced multipolarities
228AC cN NR$Relative I|g normalized to absolute I(ce) through |a(13.52|g)
228AC c Other: 1961To10
228AC cB IB From |b{+-} spectra of 1995So11, unless otherwise noted
228AC cB IB(A) I|b(6.28 level)+I|b(6.67 level)=50% {I3} (1995So11), 70%
228AC2cB (1961To10). Division of intensity based on |g data.
228AC cG E$From ce-spectrum, unless otherwise noted.
228AC cG RI Relative I|g; some could contain contributions from L| x ray
228AC2cG components present in this energy range.
228AC cG M From M- and N-subshell ce ratios and M-subshell conversion
228AC2cG coefficients
228AC cG TI Experimental I(|g+ce) deduced from |SIce + I|g
228AC cG CC Uncertainty given is due to |DE only
228AC cG M(B) E1 mult. For the 15.5-keV |g deduced from absence of
228AC2cG ce-lines. If the 15.15-keV ce-lines belong to this transition, then
228AC3cG |a(exp)|?19; theory: |a(E1)=4.5, |a(M1)=230, |a(E2)=27200
228AC cL J$All configurations are from 1995So11
228AC cL E$From least squares fit to E|g
228AC G 15.15 8 3 APB
228AC cG M1, M2 and M3 lines observed in the ce-spectrum only
228AC G 15.5 2 10 2 (E1) 4.07 16 1 APB
228ACS G M/T=0.613 15$N+/T=0.190 8
228ACS G N/T=0.156 7$O/T=0.0305 15$P/T=0.00380 17$Q/T=9.8E-5 4
228AC cG This |g seen only in the photon spectrum may be the same
228AC2cG as the 15.15-keV transition observed in the ce-spectrum
228AC G 16.2 1 45 5 (E1) 3.62 7 9 AP
228ACS G M/T=0.75
228AC G 30.6 1
228AC cG From ce data one has mult=M1 giving I(|g+ce)|?1, or M1+E2
228AC2cG with |d=0.4 giving I(|g+ce)|?6
228AC L 0.0 3+
228AC cL Configuration=((|p 3/2[651])(|n 3/2[631])), K=3
228AC L 6.28 3 1-
228AC cL Configuration=((|p 3/2[532])(|n 3/2[631])), K=0
228AC cL E$Based on observing M2 |g to g.s. {Ilogft} also is consistent with the
228AC2cL assignment
228AC B 10 AP 7.1 AP A
228ACS B EAV=10.04 25
228AC G 6.28 3 (M2) 6.68E6 19 10 AP
228ACS G M/T=0.738 15$N+/T=0.262 9
228ACS G N/T=0.206 8$O/T=0.0470 18$P/T=0.0081 4$Q/T=0.000513 20
228AC cG M$Due to Coriolis mixing of i{-13/2} |n-orbitals. Data also
228AC2cG consistent with M1+E2 with |d|?0.03, but not consistent with pure E2
228AC3cG or higher multipolarities.
228AC L 6.670 20 1+
228AC cL Configuration=((|p 3/2[651])(|n 3/2[631])), K=0
228AC B 40 AP 6.5 AP A
228ACS B EAV=9.94 25
228AC cB E|b=39.0 {I10} (1995So11), 40 (1961To10)
228AC G 6.67 2 E2 1.56E6 4 50 AP
228ACS G M/T=0.750 11$N+/T=0.250 7
228ACS G N/T=0.200 6$O/T=0.0432 13$P/T=0.00665 20$Q/T=6.18E-6 18
228AC L 20.19 3 1-
228AC cL Configuration=((|p 3/2[532])(|n 5/2[633])), K=1
228AC B 20 6.20 14
228ACS B EAV=6.48 23
228AC cB E|b=26.0 {I15} (1995So11)
228AC G 13.52 2 100 E1 5.86 11 AP
228ACS G M/T=0.653 7$N+/T=0.201 4
228ACS G N/T=0.165 3$O/T=0.0317 6$P/T=0.00380 8$Q/T=9.19E-5 18
228AC cG $The only |g-ray unambiguously assigned from |g|g due to large
228AC2cG overleaping with {+228}Th X-rays (1995So11). Justified by the Coriolis
228AC3cG mixing of K{+|p}=0{++} and 1{++} bands.
228AC L 33.07 11 1+
228AC cL Configuration=((|p 3/2[651])(|n 5/2[633])), K=1
228AC B 30 5.12 18
228ACS B EAV=3.22 23
228AC cB E|b=14.0 {I15} (1995So11)
228AC G 12.75 5 19 4 (E1(+M2)) 1.0E5 11 3 AP ?
228ACS G M/T=0.7 6$N+/T=0.3 4
228ACS G N/T=0.2 3$O/T=0.05 7$P/T=0.008 12$Q/T=0.0005 8
228AC cG $Observed in both electron and |g spectra
228AC cG CC from I(|g+ce) and I|g; theory: |a(E1)=6.86,
228ACxcG |a(M2)=2.09|*10{+5}, |a(E1+M2)=1.0|*10{+5}
228AC G 26.4 1 M1+E2 0.07 AP 201 AP 3 AP
228AC cG $|d: from 1995So11 with no details
228ACS G L/T AP 0.749$M/T AP 0.184$N+/T AP 0.0622
228ACS G N/T AP 0.0488$O/T AP 0.0112$P/T AP 0.00202$Q/T AP 0.000156